Logistics by product
Soft Drinks & Non-Alcoholic Logistics
The paperwork advantage is real: with no excise duty applying in most markets, there is no bonded movement, no duty-suspension arrangement and no alcohol licensing to satisfy, so the documentation set reduces to ordinary commercial and customs paperwork. That removes the complication that dominates spirits shipping and leaves the question as one of pure freight efficiency.
Freight efficiency here is a weight problem. Water and juice are dense and the packaging adds to it, so a container of 1.5-litre PET or of glass reaches its payload limit well before the floor is covered — buying more cube achieves nothing once the tonnes are spent. Cans shift the balance back towards volume. The practical consequence is that a soft-drinks load is planned against weight and a mixed load is balanced by pairing dense lines with light ones rather than by filling space.
Still lines — juice, water, concentrate — can move in bulk by flexitank at up to roughly 27,000 litres per container, on the same logic as bulk wine: stop shipping the packaging. Carbonated product cannot, because a flexitank is unpressurised and carbonation needs packaging built to hold it. Temperature tolerance is wider than for wine or beer, but not unlimited in either direction: sustained heat deforms PET and weakens cartons, and freezing on a northern winter routing will split cans and burst bottles.
Planning reference
| Excise duty | Not normally applicable — lighter documentation |
|---|---|
| Binding container constraint | Payload weight for most bottled lines |
| Bulk option | Flexitank, still lines only (juice, water) |
| Flexitank capacity | Up to approx. 27,000 litres per container |
| Temperature risk | Sustained heat and freezing both damage PET and cans |
Planning figures, not commitments; the quotation is what binds. Industry reference data published by Hillebrand Gori.



